Latest tribunal judgments.

Mr P Wendolowski v DHL E-Commerce UK Ltd and Others: 1600421/2025

Mr Wendolowski brought claims of unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, breach of contract, unpaid holiday pay, direct race discrimination and race-related harassment against DHL E-Commerce UK Ltd and others. All claims were dismissed on time limit grounds: the unfair dismissal and contractual claims were out of time and it was reasonably practicable to present them within the deadline; the discrimination and harassment claims were out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.

Mr N Mills v Stephensons: 6020243/2024

Mr Mills claimed unfair dismissal, holiday pay and breach of contract against Stephensons, a law firm. The tribunal found that his employment terminated on 14 February 2022 when he signed a redundancy agreement and thereafter entered into a Consultancy Agreement, making him self-employed rather than an employee. The claims were dismissed as the unfair dismissal and notice pay claims were presented out of time and the holiday pay claim was not well-founded.

Mr T Adeleye v Milestone Global Resources Ltd: 6046182/2025

The claimant brought claims relating to unpaid wages and accrued holiday pay. The respondent paid all sums owed to the claimant during the proceedings. The tribunal dismissed all claims as there were no further sums to compensate.

Mr E Otite v Serco Ltd: 6011386/2024

The claimant brought complaints against Serco Limited which were heard over three days in April 2026. The tribunal found the claimant's complaints were not well founded and dismissed them.

Ms H L Mitchell v Akari Care Ltd: 2500989/2025

Ms H L Mitchell claimed unfair dismissal against Akari Care Limited. The tribunal heard the case on 10 April 2026 at Newcastle Employment Tribunal. The claim was dismissed as not well founded.

A-R Sahih El‑Islam Tayar v London & Quadrant Housing Trust: 6039494/2025

The claimant, representing himself, brought a claim of unfair dismissal against London & Quadrant Housing Trust. The tribunal heard evidence on 9 and 10 April 2026. The claim was dismissed as not well founded.

Mr E Amoo v London Underground Ltd and Ms S Anderson: 6039650/2025

Mr E Amoo brought a claim for unfair dismissal against London Underground Limited and Ms S Anderson, alleging constructive dismissal. The tribunal found that the claimant was not constructively dismissed and dismissed the claim. Ms S Anderson was removed as a respondent as she was not the claimant's employer.

Mr M Fiaz v Home Office: 1305012/2025

The claimant sought to amend his claim form to add a disability discrimination complaint approximately 30 months after the last alleged incident and on the eve of the final hearing. The tribunal refused to extend time, finding that the claimant must have been aware of the OHS report in 2021 confirming his thyroid condition qualified as a disability under the Equality Act 2010, and that he had not acted promptly or provided good reason for the substantial delay.

Mr R Carthy v Ms J Milner T/a Bryngwyn Stallions: 1601864/2025

The claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, discrimination under sections 13, 15, and 26 of the Equality Act 2010, and victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found all claims were brought outside the statutory time limits and that it was reasonably practicable to have brought the unfair and wrongful dismissal claims in time, and that it was not just and equitable to extend time for the discrimination and victimisation claims.

A MacDonald v Secretary of State for Justice: 6018161/2025

Alex MacDonald claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination against the Secretary of State for Justice. The tribunal heard the case over three days in April 2026. All claims were dismissed as not well-founded.

Mrs J John-Lewis v Intuitive Surgical Ltd: 3301886/2025

Mrs J John-Lewis claimed unfair dismissal against Intuitive Surgical Ltd. The tribunal found that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim of unfair dismissal was dismissed.

Mrs J Davies v Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust: 3311765/2024

Mrs J Davies, a Healthcare Assistant employed by Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust since April 2017, claimed disability discrimination, harassment and victimisation relating to arrangements for medical appointments and changes to her working pattern following a terminal cancer diagnosis in November 2022. The tribunal found that all four claims for direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, harassment related to disability and victimisation were dismissed.

Miss F Kauser v Luminate Education Group: 6023534/2025

Miss Kauser, a Teacher Facilitator, brought claims of victimisation and failure to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 against Luminate Education Group. The tribunal found that the claimant's remaining claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments were presented outside the statutory time limit and dismissed her application to extend the time on a just and equitable basis.

D Spencer v Deckhouse (Sevenoaks) Ltd: 6021339/2024

The claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination against the respondent employer. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' qualifying service required by Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The disability discrimination claim was permitted to proceed.

Ms S Fox v Clark Business Recovery Ltd: 6024919/2025

Ms S Fox brought claims for direct sex discrimination and harassment related to sex against Clark Business Recovery Ltd. The tribunal heard the case on 1st April 2026 and found both claims were not well-founded, dismissing them.

C Bannor v Ward Security Ltd: 6007182/2025

Christian Bannor brought claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, working time breaches, disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments against Ward Security Limited. The tribunal found none of the claims made out and dismissed them, with the health and safety and human rights claims having been withdrawn by the claimant.

Ms L Collins v Shaw Healthcare Ltd: 2300863/2025

Ms Collins, a Team Leader at a care home, was dismissed for gross misconduct after being photographed with her eyes closed during a night shift, alleged to be sleeping on duty. The tribunal found the respondent had a potentially fair reason to dismiss under section 98(2)(b) (conduct) and that the dismissal was fair under section 98(4), as the respondent acted reasonably despite procedural deficiencies and breaches of the ACAS Code. The claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed.

E Korkmaz v Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd: 2302107/2024

Eyup Korkmaz brought complaints of direct race discrimination and direct religious belief discrimination against Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited. The tribunal, comprising Employment Judge Tueje and lay members, heard the case over eight days in March 2026 and found both complaints not well-founded.

B Wing v Recon Services Ltd: 6036393/2025

Bradley Wing brought a claim for breach of contract relating to notice pay against Recon Services Limited. The claim was dismissed by Employment Judge Smith at the Nottingham tribunal on 27 March 2026.

Mr S Ewels v Euro foods Group Ltd: 6021501/2025

Mr Ewels claimed he suffered seven detriments as a result of making protected disclosures at Euro Foods Group Limited. The tribunal heard the case over five days and found his whistleblowing complaint failed.

Mrs K Heyman v Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board: 6024002/2025

Mrs K Heyman brought claims against Cardiff & Vale University Local Health Board for harassment relating to age, direct age discrimination, and discriminatory constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal unanimously found all three claims not well founded and dismissed them. The respondent's application for a costs order against the claimant was refused on discretionary grounds.

Miss I Scott v The Secretary of State for Justice: 6003749/2024

Miss Scott brought claims of disability discrimination and victimisation against the Secretary of State for Justice. The tribunal dismissed her claims of unfavourable treatment arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments, but found two specific victimisation complaints well-founded: comments made in a meeting on 21 March 2024 and an email sent by Ms Kilroy on 6 June 2024.

Mr L Baxter v Chief Constable North Wales Police: 1600314/2025

Mr L Baxter brought a claim of Direct Sex Discrimination against Chief Constable North Wales Police. The tribunal heard evidence over four days in March 2026. The claim of Direct Sex Discrimination failed and was dismissed.

Dr L Leonard v Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust: 6008417/2024

Dr Lucy Leonard brought a claim of constructive unfair dismissal against Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust following disciplinary proceedings relating to an undeclared relationship with a patient/service user. The claimant alleged multiple breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence in how the disciplinary process was conducted. The tribunal dismissed the claim, finding that whilst there were some procedural failings, they did not amount to fundamental breach of contract, and critically, the claimant had already decided to resign before the alleged breaches occurred.

T Walker v Novocastrian Ltd: 6026871/2025

Tom Walker claimed unpaid wages, a redundancy payment, and breach of contract against Novocastrian Ltd. The tribunal dismissed all claims. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons would be provided only if requested within 14 days.

Ms S Begum v Toomey Motor Group Ltd: 3202215/2024

Ms Begum, a Bangladeshi national, claimed direct race discrimination and victimisation following withdrawal of a job offer and subsequent dismissal from Toomey Motor Group Limited. The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove facts supporting discrimination or victimisation, and that the respondent's explanation for dismissal (persistent lateness) was not tainted by either.

Mr E Lacatus v The Metal Recycling Group Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation): 6040494/2025

Mr Lacatus claimed unfair dismissal and related wage claims against The Metal Recycling Group Limited (in liquidation). The tribunal dismissed all claims: the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had only 16 months' service (below the required 2-year qualifying period) and the remaining claims under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the final hearing without communication.

Mr A Switala v The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust and J Jillings: 3301915/2024 and Others

The claimant applied for reconsideration of an order made on 13 January 2026. Employment Judge Cowen refused the application on the basis that there is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.

Mr E Arroyo v Premier Support Services: 1300358/2025

The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because he did not have the required 2 years' service under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1998. Complaints under sections 10 and 12 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant also confirmed he did not pursue complaints relating to notice pay or outstanding wages.

Ms S Belton v Natures Journey Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade: 6027753/2025

Ms Belton brought claims for unpaid wages, partly unpaid notice pay, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay against Natures Journey Ltd (in liquidation) and the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. The tribunal dismissed all claims as they were brought out of the primary time limit and the claimant provided no evidence for why it was not reasonably practicable to bring them in time. The claim for injury to feelings was also dismissed as misconceived, being unavailable as a remedy for wage deduction and contractual claims.

J Onokuah v Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust: 1811269/2024

The claimant brought claims of race discrimination against Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. The tribunal found that the claims were brought outside the statutory time limit and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. The claim was dismissed.

Dr C Agbo v North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust: 3313755/2023

Dr Agbo brought claims of unfair dismissal and race discrimination against North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust following termination of his fixed-term locum consultant contract in August 2023. The respondent conceded procedural unfairness but the tribunal found substantively that dismissal was fair because the claimant had failed to obtain specialist registration within the 2-year timeframe that applied to all locum consultants. The race discrimination claim was dismissed as not well-founded; the tribunal found no evidence of less favourable treatment based on race.

Mr A Gomes Da Costa v WM Morrison Ltd: 3308984/2023

The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and victimisation against WM Morrison Ltd. The tribunal found the dismissal was procedurally unfair, though there was a 90% chance the claimant would have been dismissed had a fair procedure been followed. The victimisation complaint was dismissed as not well founded.

S Honey v Ideagen Software Ltd: 6016300/2024

Samantha Honey brought a complaint of direct sex discrimination against Ideagen Software Limited. The tribunal found the complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it.

A Mediratta v DHL Supply Chain Ltd: 6012316/2025

This is a reconsideration application of a judgment dated 23 February 2026 in which the tribunal dismissed the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal complaint as not well-founded. The claimant sought reconsideration arguing the tribunal's findings contained factual contradictions regarding when a request for compassionate leave was made. The tribunal refused the application, finding it constituted an impermissible attempt to re-litigate matters already fully ventilated and properly argued at the original hearing.

A Cooper v Cranswick Convenience Foods Ltd: 6018916/2024

The claimant, an Engineering Administrator, was dismissed on grounds of redundancy in July 2024 after 7 years of employment. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim not well founded, but upheld her equal pay claim against her male comparator Tony Burke, finding she was employed on like work and the respondent failed to establish a material factor defence. The claimant was awarded £21,638.27 in arrears of pay with interest.

Ms E Louison v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust: 6006043/2024

Ms E Louison, disabled by Sickle Cell Anaemia and PTSD, brought claims against Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust for harassment related to race and disability, unfavourable treatment under s.15 of the Equality Act 2010, and unfair dismissal. The tribunal dismissed all claims. The claimant represented herself with her daughter's assistance.

Mr S Pipkin v Hollowells Ltd: 3302777/2025

Mr Pipkin was dismissed for conduct on 8 April 2025 after approximately four years of employment with Hollowells Limited, a funeral service provider. He claimed unfair dismissal and alleged the respondent's real reason was to dismiss him before he could accrue two years' service. The tribunal found the dismissal was for conduct, followed a fair procedure within the band of reasonable responses, and dismissed his claim.

Ms K Adams v People Potential Possibilities (a charity): 1305037/2024

Ms K Adams brought claims of direct race discrimination against People Potential Possibilities, a charity. The tribunal heard evidence from 23 to 26 February 2026. The tribunal found the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination failed and dismissed them.

Miss I Noon v Little Oaks Nursery Leeds Ltd: 6002138/2025

Miss Irene Noon brought claims against Little Oaks Nursery Leeds Limited for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint and most reasonable adjustment complaints not well-founded, and dismissed the shopping-related reasonable adjustment claim as out of time with no just and equitable extension.