Back to search
2207444/2021unknown

Google UK Ltd

4 May 2022England & WalesEmployment Judge Goraj
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's application for interim relief due to lack of evidence supporting her claims of unfair or constructive dismissal. The case included allegations of discrimination, whistleblowing, and other issues.

Key Issues

  • claimant's application for interim relief pursuant to sections 103A and 128 (1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is dismissed
  • the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal and claim for interim relief were accepted by the Tribunals, but remaining claims were rejected pending receipt of an ACAS Certificate

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

laimant and the Tribunals, the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal and claim for interim relief were accepted by the Trib

Protected disclosures / whistleblowingEmployment Rights Act 1996

issal. The case included allegations of discrimination, whistleblowing, and other issues.

Decision Text

In the London Central Employment Tribunal Case no 2207444.2021 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant MZ Respondent Google UK Limited Heard at: Exeter (remotely) On: 11 April 2022 Before: Employment Judge Goraj Representation Claimant: in person The Respondent: Mr D Craig QC, Counsel RESERVED JUDGMENT THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL IS THAT - The claimant’s application for interim relief pursuant to sections 103A and 128 (1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is dismissed. REASONS Documentation 1. The Tribunal has been provided with the following documentation by the parties for the purposes of this Preliminary Hearing: - 1.1 The claimant: - (1) the claimant’s witness statement/ application for interim relief (“the claimant’s application”) and (2) the claimant’s documents bundle (“CDB”). 1.2 The respondent: - (1) the respondent’s documents bundle (RDB”) (2) the respondent’s pleadings bundle (“RPB”) (3) the In the London Central Employment Tribunal Case no 2207444.2021 2 respondent’s bundle of authorities (“RBA”) (4) the respondent’s occupational health bundle (“ROH”) (5) the respondent’s skeleton argument (“RSA”) (6) Witness statement of Anna Frazer ( People & Culture Partner) and (7) Witness statement of Tim Lillicrap (Senior Staff Research Scientist). 2. The documents (where relevant) are referred to below accordingly. Introduction 3. By a claim form which was presented to the Tribunals on 8 December 2021 (paragraphs 1- 12 of the RPB), the claimant brought claims which included claims for discrimination because of disability, constructive dismissal, whistle blowing and interim relief (paragraph 8 at pages 6- 7 of the RPB). The claim...

Download full PDF

Employer

Case Details

Case Number
2207444/2021
Decision Date
04/05/2022
Published
06/02/2024
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Goraj