Evolve Guarding Solutions and Capricorn Leisure Ltd
Case Summary
The claim for a redundancy payment is struck out as the claimant was employed for less than two years and therefore does not have the right to a redundancy payment.
Key Issues
- •The claimant claims the right to a redundancy payment
- •The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years
- •The claimant does not have the right to a redundancy payment
Claim Types
Decision Text
each EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: A Raza Respondents: 1. Evolve Guarding Solutions, 2. Capricorn Leisure Ltd JUDGMENT The claim for a redundancy payment is struck out. REASONS 1. The claimant claims the right to a redundancy payment. 2. Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 says that employees do not have the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more. 3. The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. 4. Therefore, the claimant does not have the right to a redundancy payment. 5. The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the claim for a redundancy payment should not be struck out but has not given an acceptable reason. 6. Accordingly, the claim for a redundancy payment is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Approved by Employment Judge KM Ross Date: 18 November 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Date: 20 January 2025 ........................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 6025111/2025
- Decision Date
- 18/11/2025
- Published
- 12/02/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross