8000887/2025Respondent won

Drs McNutt, Gall and Black, T/a Simpson Medical Group

v Mrs G McMurdo

16 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·Scotland·Employment Judge Sangster

Respondent

Drs McNutt, Gall and Black, T/a Simpson Medical Group

All cases →

Decision date

16 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

Scotland

Judge

Employment Judge Sangster

Case Summary

The claimant's complaints do not succeed and are dismissed.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal found that the claimant's complaints were not well-founded and the claims were dismissed.

Key Issues

  • The claimant presented complaints of disability discrimination (direct discrimination, harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments) and constructive unfair dismissal.

Decision Text

Full PDF

E.T. Z4 (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000887/2025 Held in Edinburgh on 16-20 and 25-26 February 2026 Employment Judge Sangster Mrs G McMurdo Claimant In Person Drs McNutt, Gall & Black, trading as Simpson Medical Group Respondent Represented by Ms S Hosten Lay Representative JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The judgment of the Tribunal is that the claimant’s complaints do not succeed and are dismissed. REASONS Introduction 1. The claimant presented complaints of disability discrimination (direct discrimination, harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments) and constructive unfair dismissal. 2. The final hearing was previously listed to take place, commencing on 1 December 2025. That hearing was postponed, as parties were not in a position to proceed. A case management preliminary hearing was conducted instead, at which this hearing was listed, case management orders were issued and, as stated by EJ Cowan in the note which she issued following the case 8000887/2025 Page 2 management hearing, the remainder of the day was spent identifying the issues to be determined at the final hearing. EJ Cowan prepared a list of issues, noting that ‘these are different in many ways to the list of issues which was produced for today’s hearing by each party. But the claimant was sure at the end of the hearing today that we had been able to identify all the claims she had been making and that nothing had been missed.’ 3. Despite those case management orders, parties had not agreed a bundle of productions to be used at the final hearing. Instead, parties produced their own bundles as follows: 3.1. The claimant produced a bundle extendi

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.