Mitie Ltd

Case Summary

Mr S Kippen brought claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay against Mitie Limited. The tribunal, having heard the case on 17 February 2026, was not satisfied that the claimant's claims were made out on the evidence presented. The claims were dismissed.

The tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant had proven his claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay on the evidence presented in the ET1 form and supporting documentation.

• •Unpaid wages in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
• •Holiday pay

Case No. 6024360/25 & 6024876/25 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr S Kippen Respondent: Mitie Limited Heard at: Manchester On: 17 February 2026 Before: Tribunal Judge Holt REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Respondent: In person Ms L. Kaye (Counsel) JUDGMENT 1. At the hearing before me, I was not satisfied that the Claimant’s claims for (i) unpaid wages (in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996) and (ii) holiday pay was made out as set out in the Claimant’s ET1 form and supporting evidence. Summary 2. Consequently, the claims are dismissed. Tribunal Judge Holt Dated: 17 February 2026 JUDGMENT AND ORDERS SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 8 April 2026 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No. 6024360/25 & 6024876/25 2 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing (none being recorded) or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.