6022183/2024Struck out

Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

v Mr J Unwin

1 September 2025·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Brace

Respondent

Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

1 September 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Brace

Case Summary

The claims for breach of the Health and Safety Act 1974, detriment complaints under s.44 Employment Rights Act 1996, and complaint of breach of the Flexible Working Regulations 2014 and/or s80I Employment Rights Act 1996 were struck out.

Key Issues

  • complaints of breach of the Health and Safety Act 1974
  • detriment complaints under s.44 Employment Rights Act 1996
  • complaint of breach of the Flexible Working Regulations 2014 and/or s80I Employment Rights Act 1996

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case Number: 6022183 / 2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr J Unwin Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Limited JUDGMENT The Respondent’s name is amended to Taylor Wimpey UK Limited. The following complaints are struck out: 1.1 Any complaint for breach of the Health and Safety Act 1974; 1.2 Any detriment complaint under s.44 Employment Rights Act 1996 1.3 Any complaint of breach of the Flexible Working Regulations 2014 and/or s80I Employment Rights Act 1996. Reasons 1. By case management orders made on 16 April 2025, the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to confirm whether he consented to the amendment of the Respondent’s name to Taylor Wimpey UK Limited and if not, to state why he asserts his employer was not Taylor Wimpey UK Limited. He has failed to do so and I consider that it is in the interests of justice to now amend the Respondent to Taylor Wimpey UK Limited. 2. By the same case management orders, the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaints of breach of the Health and Safety Act 1974, detriment complaints under s.44 Employment Rights Act 1996, and any complaint of breach of the Flexible Working Regulations 2014 and/or s80I Employment Rights Act 1996 should not be struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success. 3. The Claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaints as identified are therefore struck out. Case Number: 6022183 / 2024 4. The Claimant’s remaining claim(s) remains listed for hearing on case management on 1 September 2025. Employment Judge Brace Authorised for issue on 23 May 2025 Judgment sent to the parties on: 03 June 2025 For the Tribunal Office: Katie Dickson

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.