Arriva Rail London Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant's claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rules 38(1)(c) and 38(1)(e) because the claimant failed to comply with tribunal rules or orders and it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing. The final hearing scheduled for 11 and 12 May 2026 was vacated.

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to comply with tribunal rules or orders and because it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing in respect of the claim.

• •Compliance with Employment Tribunal Rules or Tribunal orders
• •Fairness of hearing

Case No. 6022112/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr James Titchener Respondent: Arriva Rail London Limited Heard at: London South (by CVP) On: 11 May 2026 Before: Employment Judge Yardley Representation Claimant: Mr K Pal, Counsel Respondent: Ms E Hodgetts, Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The Claimant’s claim is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) because the Claimant has not complied with the Tribunal Rules or a Tribunal order and Rule 38(1)(e) because it is no longer possible to have a fair hearing in respect of it. 2. The final hearing listed for 11 and 12 May 2026 is vacated. 3. _____________________ Employment Judge Yardley Date: 11 May 2026 Sent to the parties on: Date: 18 May 2026 Note Summary reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request for either written summary reasons or written full reasons is made by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If a party requests written summary reasons then the Tribunal may, if it considers it appropriate to do so, provide written full reasons. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 51) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.