‘O Ver Borough Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation)

Case Summary

The claimant succeeded in a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, and was awarded £545.35 which was the gross sum deducted.

The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages during the period 1 to 6 February 2025, and therefore the complaint was well-founded.

• •unauthorised deductions from wages

Case No: 6020031/2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Max Martin Respondent: ‘O Ver Borough Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) Heard at: London South (by video) On: 20 November 2025 Before: Employment Judge Evans (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: in person Respondent: Mr Angelo Luca, company accountant JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: 1. Following the claimant’s application on 20 August 2025, which was copied to the respondent but to which the respondent did not object, the respondent’s name is amended to ‘O Ver Borough Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation). 2. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in respect of the period 1 to 6 February 2025. 3. The respondent shall pay the claimant £545.35, which is the gross sum deducted. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance. 4. The claimant’s application to amend his claim to add a complaint in respect of the respondent’s alleged failure to pay him an amount in respect of accrued but untaken holiday, which was made at the hearing today, is refused. Case No: 6020031/2025 _____________________________ Employment Judge Evans Approved 20 November 2025 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions All judgments (apart from those under rule 52) and any reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at …