6016300/2024Respondent Successful

Ideagen Software Ltd

v S Honey

20 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge McTigue

Respondent

Ideagen Software Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

20 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge McTigue

Case Summary

Samantha Honey brought a complaint of direct sex discrimination against Ideagen Software Limited. The tribunal found the complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it.

Why this outcome?

Claim not well-founded

The tribunal found the complaint of direct sex discrimination was not well-founded, resulting in dismissal of the claim.

Key Issues

  • direct sex discrimination

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Samantha Honey Respondent: Ideagen Software Limited Heard at: Nottingham On: 12, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge McTigue sitting alone Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms Duane of Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of direct sex discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge McTigue Dated: 20 March 2026 Sent to the parties on ...31 March 2026.................. For the Employment Tribunal .............................................. Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here: www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.