Muller UK & Ireland Group LLP

Case Summary

The claimant Mr K Wszolkowski was successful in his complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages regarding carried over holiday pay. The respondent, Muller UK & Ireland Group LLP, was ordered to pay £1,076.90.

The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in relation to carried over holiday pay, and therefore the claimant's complaint succeeded on its merits.

• •unauthorised deduction from wages relating to carried over holiday pay for the year ending 2023

Case No 6008976/2024 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr K Wszolkowski Respondent: Muller UK & Ireland Group LLP Heard at: Manchester Employment Tribunal (by CVP) On: 10 th February 2025 Before: Employment Judge Thompson (sitting alone) REPRESENTATION: Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms Duane, Counsel JUDGMENT 1. The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages relating to carried over holiday pay for the year ending 2023 is well-founded. The respondent shall pay the claimant the sum of £1,076.90, which is the gross sum. The claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or national insurance. 2. The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages relating to bonus payments for the year ending 2023 and/or for unpaid expenses are not well- founded and are dismissed. Employment Judge Thompson Date: 11 th February 2025 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON Date: 13 February 2025 Case No 6008976/2024 2 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE (1) Any person who without reasonable excuse fails to comply with an Order to which section 7(4) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 applies shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine of £1,000.00. (2) Under rule 6, if this Order is not complied with, the Tribunal may take such action as it considers just which may include (a) waiving or varying the requirement; (b) striking out the claim or the response, in whole or in part, in accordance with rule 37; (c) barring or restricting a party’s participation in the proceedings; and/or (d) awarding costs in accordance with rules 74-84. (3) You may apply under rule 29 for this Order to be varied…