Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
Decision Overview
Case Summary
The claimant brought direct sex and race discrimination complaints against HMRC regarding the use of specific language in a conduct checklist. The tribunal found the sex and race discrimination complaints about the phrase 'bravely raised their concerns' succeeded, while other complaints were dismissed. The parties agreed remedy by consent and the respondent was ordered to pay £2,000 compensation.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal found that the claimant's direct sex and race discrimination complaints regarding the specific language 'bravely raised their concerns' in the conduct checklist succeeded, while the remaining complaints were not well founded and were dismissed.
Compensation
Estimated total
£2,000
Extracted from the judgment text and may not capture every award component precisely.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •Direct sex discrimination in relation to the use of the words 'bravely raised their concerns' in a conduct checklist dated 1 December 2023
- •Direct race discrimination in relation to the same conduct checklist language
Cited Laws and Legal Issues
The claimant brought direct sex and race discrimination complaints against HMRC regarding the use of specific language in a conduct checklist.
Decision Text
Note: All judgments apart from those under rule 51 and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant and respondent. EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant:Mr Nicholas Cottrell Respondent:Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs FINAL HEARING Heard at: Birmingham, in publicOn: 2 to 6, 9 & 10 February 2026 Before:Employment Judge Camp, Mrs DP Hill OBE Mr K Palmer Appearances For the Claimant: in person For the Respondent: Miss L Price, counsel JUDGMENT (1) This judgment was issued on 9 February 2026. The Claimant’s direct sex and race discrimination complaints about the use of the words “bravely raised their concerns” in a so-called ‘conduct checklist’ of 1 December 2023 succeed. The Claimant’s other complaints fail and are dismissed. (2) Reasons were given orally at the hearing on 9 February 2026. Written reasons will not be provided unless asked for by a written request presented by any party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. (3) This judgment was issued on 10 February 2026. In light of the above decisions, and without prejudice to any appeal or application for reconsideration, the parties have agreed remedy and, by consent, the Respondent must pay the Claimant compensation of £2,000. Employment Judge Camp Approved on 10 February 2026
Case Facts
- Claimant
- Mr N Cottrell
- Case Number
- 6008680/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision Date
- 10 February 2026
- Published
- 15 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
- Representation
- Litigant in person