Fresh Relevance Ltd

Case Summary

The claimant brought claims for breach of contract and unauthorised deduction of wages in respect of unpaid annual leave against Fresh Relevance Ltd. The tribunal found the claims were not well founded and dismissed them, concluding the respondent did not act in breach of contract and the claimant was paid the sums properly payable under the contract.

The tribunal found the claimant's claims regarding unpaid annual leave were not well founded. The respondent did not breach the contract, and the claimant received all sums properly payable under the contract terms for accrued but untaken annual leave.

• •Breach of contract in relation to unpaid annual leave
• •Unauthorised deduction of wages for accrued but untaken annual leave

Case No: 6007210/2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Andrew Wilkins Respondent: Fresh Relevance Ltd Heard at: Bristol (by CVP) On: 6 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge Midgley Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr S Gilmore (Solicitor) JUDGMENT UPON reading the papers FURTHER UPON the parties agreement that the statements of the witnesses could be taken as read AND UPON hearing argument from the claimant in person and Mr Gilmour for the respondent. The Judgment of the Tribunal is: 1. The claims of breach of contract and/or unauthorised deduction of wages in respect of unpaid annual leave are well not founded and are dismissed. 2. The respondent did not act in breach of contract and the claimant was therefore paid the sums that were properly payable under the contract in relation to accrued but untaken annual leave. Approved by Employment Judge Midgley Date 6 March 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 19 March 2026 By Mr J McCormick Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.