Manchester City Council

Case Summary

The claim was struck out as the claimant failed to comply with a tribunal order and did not pursue the case actively.

The claimant failed to comply with a tribunal order and did not actively pursue the case, resulting in the claim being struck out.

• •the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 2 January 2025 and sent to the parties on 7 January 2025; and it has not been actively pursued

Case No: 6005204/24 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A O’Reilly Respondent: Manchester City Council JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. By an Order dated 31 March 2025 and sent to the parties on 16 April 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because • the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 2 January 2025 and sent to the parties on 7 January 2025; and • it has not been actively pursued. 2. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by Employment Judge Porter Date: 24 May 2025 Case No: 6005204/24 2 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 7 July 2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE