Proritas Healthcare Professionals Ltd

Case Summary

Ms Namayanja claimed harassment and direct discrimination related to religion, which were found not to be well-founded and dismissed. Her claims for breach of contract (partially) and unauthorised wage deductions (fully) were successful, resulting in a total award of £3,396.82.

The harassment and discrimination claims were not well-founded and dismissed. The breach of contract claim was partially successful regarding 8 hours' work on 15 October 2023. The unauthorised wage deductions claim was fully successful for both supported living shifts and untaken holiday.

• •Harassment related to religion
• •Direct discrimination because of religion
• •Breach of contract for 8 hours' work on 15 October 2023
• •Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of supported living shifts
• •Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of untaken holiday

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms T Namayanja Respondent: Proritas Healthcare Professionals Ltd Heard at: East London Hearing Centre On: 25-27 March 2026 Before: Employment Judge J Feeny Representation For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Ms R Morgan, counsel JUDGMENT 1. The claim for harassment related to religion is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The claim for direct discrimination because of religion is not well-founded and is dismissed. 3. The claim for breach of contract in respect of 8 hours’ work on 15 October 2023 is well-founded. The respondent must pay to the claimant the sum of £87.36 gross of deductions for tax and national insurance. The remainder of the breach of contract claim (relating to the care coordinator role) is not well-founded. 4. The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded: a. In respect of the supported living shifts, the respondent must pay to the claimant the sum of £1,846.18 gross of deductions for tax and national insurance. b. In respect of the untaken holiday, the respondent must pay to the claimant the sum of £1,463.28 gross of deductions for tax and national insurance. 5. The total amount the respondent must pay to the claimant is £3,396.82 gross of deductions for tax and national insurance. Approved by: Employment Judge J Feeny Dated: 27 March 2026 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decis…