6002869/2024Struck out

Dumbledore Dental Care Ltd

v H Grewal

13 February 2025·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Bax

Respondent

Dumbledore Dental Care Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

13 February 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Bax

Case Summary

The complaint of whistleblowing was struck out as the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. The remaining claims are listed for a future hearing.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The whistleblowing complaint was struck out because the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing, indicating a lack of active engagement with the proceedings.

Claim Types

Key Issues

  • complaint of whistleblowing not actively pursued

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: H Grewal Respondent: Dumbledore Dental Care Ltd JUDGMENT The complaint of whistleblowing is struck out. REASONS 1. By a letter dated 20 January 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of whistleblowing should not be struck out because it  it has not been actively pursued. 2. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of whistleblowing is therefore struck out. 3. The claimant’s remaining claim(s) remains listed for hearing on 7 March 2025. Approved by: Employment Judge Bax Date: 13 February 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 28 February 2025 By Mr J McCormick FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.