Luxury Leisure

Case Summary

The claim was struck out as the Claimant did not respond to the strike out warning, and the hearing was cancelled.

The claimant failed to respond to a strike out warning issued by the tribunal, resulting in the claim being struck out and the hearing being cancelled.

• •Claim not being actively pursued

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms M Ionica Respondent: Luxury Leisure JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. On 6 February 2024, a case management hearing was listed before Employment Judge Adkinson. Neither party attended the hearing. As a result, EJ Adkinson sent orders to the parties the same date, indicating that consideration would be given to striking out the claim because it was not being actively pursued. The parties were given an opportunity to object to that course by writing to the tribunal no later than 14 February 2024. 2. The Respondent replied to the strike out warning on 06 February 2024. The Claimant, however, has not responded to the strike out warning, to make representations as to why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. 3. The claim is therefore struck out on the ground it is not being actively pursued. 4. The hearing fixed for 29 & 30 September 2025 and 01 October 2025 will not take place. Employment Judge Clark 15 February 2024 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ........................................................................ ........................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE