6001186/2025Struck out

Altegra Integrated Solutions Ltd (In Administration)

v Ms J Treadwell

27 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Regional Employment Judge Pirani

Respondent

Altegra Integrated Solutions Ltd (In Administration)

All cases →

Decision date

27 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Regional Employment Judge Pirani

Case Summary

Ms Treadwell's claim against Altegra Integrated Solutions Limited (In Administration) was struck out for non-pursuit. The tribunal had previously requested confirmation that the claimant had permission from the Administrator or a High Court Order to continue the claim. After the claimant failed to respond to multiple communications and failed to respond to the strike-out warning, the claim was struck out.

Why this outcome?

Non-compliance with orders

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to actively pursue it and did not respond to the tribunal's requests for confirmation of permission from the Administrator, or to the strike-out warning letter, despite being given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing.

Key Issues

  • Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit
  • Permission from Administrator for claim continuation

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms J Treadwell Respondent: Altegra Integrated Solutions Limited (In Administration) JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. By an email sent on 25 March 2026 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because the claim has not been actively pursued. 2. The claimant was asked to respond by 10 am on 27 March 2026. 3. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing why this should not be done or to request a hearing. 4. Previously, on 20 November 2025, the tribunal wrote to the claimant asking her to confirm whether she had permission from the Administrator or an Order from their High Court so that she was able to continue with her claim. Because the claimant did not reply, a chasing email was sent to her on 27 February 2026. Again, the claimant did not reply. 5. The claim is therefore struck out. 6. The hearing fixed for 30 March 2026 will not take place. Approved by: Regional Employment Judge Pirani 27 March 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 27 March 2026 Jade Lobb FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.