Argyll and Bute Council

Case Summary

The claim is struck out as the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's order to provide written reasons or request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out.

The claimant failed to comply with a tribunal order requiring written reasons or a hearing request to explain why the claim should not be struck out, resulting in strike-out under Rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim.

• •The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d)

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Mr C WoodClaimant Argyll & Bute CouncilRespondent JUDGMENT The claim is struck outunder rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claimhas not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d). REASONS 1.On21 October 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 4 November 2024 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. 2.The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim. Employment Judge (signature) L Wiseman Employment Judge (Name) Date of judgment Date sent to parties L Wiseman 05 December 2024 05 December 2024