Tayside Contracts

Case Summary

The claim was struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 as the claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing in response to a strike-out warning under rule 38, leading to the claim being struck out.

• •claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d)

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Mr R KeenClaimant Tayside ContractsRespondent JUDGMENT The claim is struck out under rule 38 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 on the grounds that the claimhas not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d). REASONS 1. On10 December 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by24 December 2024or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. 2. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim. Date of judgment Date sent to parties Employment Judge, L Wiseman 29th January 2025 29th January 2025