4110327/2014Struck out

Tayside Contracts

v Mr B Anderson

29 January 2025·Employment Tribunal·Scotland·Lucy Wiseman

Respondent

Tayside Contracts

All cases →

Decision date

29 January 2025

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

Scotland

Judge

Lucy Wiseman

Case Summary

The claim was struck out as the claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing by the deadline.

Why this outcome?

Non-compliance with orders

The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing by the deadline set by the tribunal, resulting in the claim being struck out.

Claim Types

Key Issues

  • failure to actively pursue claim in terms of rule 38(1)(d)

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, Lucy Wiseman Mr B Anderson Claimant Tayside Contracts Respondent JUDGMENT The claim is struck out under rule 38 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024 on the grounds that the claimhas not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d). REASONS 1. On10 December 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by24 December 2024or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. 2. The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim. Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman 29 th January 2025 Date of judgment 29 th January2025 Date sent to parties

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.