Loomis UK Ltd

Case Summary

The claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 due to lack of active pursuit.

The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37 because the claimant failed to actively pursue the claim.

• •correspondence returned marked 'gone away', no new address provided, claimant's previous agents withdrew from acting for him

EMPLOYMENTTRIBUNALS(SCOTLAND) CaseNumber: 4108472/2015 MrTWilson Claimant Loomis UKLimitedRespondent JUDGMENT The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d). REASONS 1. The correspondence to the claimant at the address provided has been returned marked ‘gone away’. No new address has been provided by the claimant. The claimant’s previous agents have withdrawn from acting for him. They do not hold for him any address other than that in the claim form. In those circumstances it appears that the claim is not being actively pursued. It is therefore struck out. Date sent to parties Employment Judge: L Wiseman Date of Judgment: 04 September 2024 Entered in register: 04 September 2024 and copied to parties