Decision date
13 October 2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judge
Employment Judge S Kemp
Case Summary
The claim was struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 as the claimant had not actively pursued the claim.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out under rule 38 because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim.
Claim Types
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge S Kemp Ms E KrejciClaimant Tayside Contracts Dundee City Council Respondents Represented by Ms D Miller Mr S Miller JUDGMENT The claim is struck out under rule 38 of theEmployment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the groundsthat the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d) REASONS 1.On 25 September 2025 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant to give the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 9 October 2025 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out as the claimant had not responded to earlier correspondence with regard to the claim.. 2.The claimant has failed torespond to the letter. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim. Date sent to parties 13 October 2025
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- Ms E Krejci
- Case No.
- 4107823/2021
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 13 October 2025
- Published
- 29 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Kemp
- Industry
- Public Sector / Government