Back to search
4102660/2019Dismissed

NHS Highland

17 May 2021ScotlandEmployment Judge B Campbell
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claimant, Dr A Khan, was not unfairly dismissed by NHS Highland. The case turned on whether the respondent treated the claimant reasonably in all circumstances.

Why this outcome?

Dismissal found fair

The tribunal found that NHS Highland treated the claimant reasonably in all the circumstances of the case, and therefore the dismissal was not unfair.

Key Issues

  • whether the respondent met the requirements of section 98(4) ERA so that the dismissal was fair overall

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

A critical finding made by the Court in support of the original tribunal's decision to dismiss a claim of unfair dismissal was that there 25 was material on which to make a finding that the claimant could not work harmoniously with his colleagues.

Decision Text

E.T. Z4 (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 4102660/2019 Held on 4, 5, 6 AND 7 MAY 2021 BY CVP Employment Judge B Campbell 10 Dr A Khan Claimant Represented by Mr E Stafford 15 Solicitor 20 NHS Highland Respondent Represented by Mr K McGuire, Counsel 25 JUDGMENT The judgment of the employment tribunal is that: 1. the claimant was not unfairly dismissed contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and 2. the claim is therefore dismissed. 30 REASONS GENERAL S/4102660/19 Page 2 1. This claim arises out of the claimant's employment by the respondent which began on 1 December 2001 and ended on 19 September 2018 with his dismissal. The claimant asserts that he was unfairly dismissed. 2. Evidence was heard from, in order, Ms Tracy Ligema, Mr David Park and Mr David Garden of the respondent, and the claimant himself. The parties had 5 helpfully prepared an indexed and paginated joint bundle of documents. Numbers in square brackets below are references to the page numbers of the bundle. The claimant also provided an updated schedule of loss which superseded the version in the joint bundle. Some of the key values within it were agreed by the parties. 10 3. All of the witnesses were found generally to be credible and reliable. The parties were not in direct conflict over much of the evidence and the case turned more on matters such as the severity of the sanction imposed and whether the respondent had treated the claimant reasonably in all of the circumstances throughout what ultimately became a lengthy process. The parties' 15 representatives provided written submissions at the close of the hearing which were considered and where ap...

Download full PDF

Employer

Employment Details

Industry
healthcare
Representation
Legally represented

Case Details

Case Number
4102660/2019
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Level
First instance
Decision Date
17/05/2021
Published
27/05/2021
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judge
Employment Judge B Campbell