Saica Pack UK Ltd

Case Summary

The claim is struck out because the claimant failed to provide written reasons or request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out.

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to actively pursue the claim, having not provided written reasons or requested a hearing to explain why it should not be struck out, breaching Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.

• •The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d)

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Mr J LairdClaimant Saica Pack UK LimitedRespondent JUDGMENT The claim is struck out underrule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claimhas not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d). REASONS 1.On11November 2024the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by25 November 2024or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out. 2.The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim. Employment Judge (signature) L Wiseman Employment Judge (Name) Date of judgment Date sent to parties 05 December 2024 05 December 2024 L Wiseman