Back to search
3303643/2024Dismissed

Nikki Marks Ltd

23 January 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Dick
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claimant, Mrs N Ross, was dismissed from her role as a Senior Beauty Therapist at Nikki Marks Ltd. The case centered on whether she was an employee before the sale of the company's shares to Your Skin Coach Limited and if there had been a TUPE transfer.

Key Issues

  • employment status before 22 September 2023
  • transfer within the meaning of TUPE Regulations 2006/246

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

oyment) Regulations 2006/246. 3. The complaints of unfair dismissal and failing to make a redundancy payment are dismissed

Working Time Regulations 1998Working Time Regulations 1998

a set amount monthly (which was achieved by payment of holiday pay and sick pay when the claimant did not work) and an obl

Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006

ares to Your Skin Coach Limited and if there had been a TUPE transfer.

Decision Text

Case No: 3303643/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs N Ross Respondent: Nikki Marks Ltd Heard at: Watford On: 25 October 2024 Before: Employment Judge Dick Representation Claimant: Ms C Howells (counsel) Respondent: Miss C Jeffrey (director of the respondent company) RESERVED JUDGMENT 1. Before 22 September 2023 the claimant was not an employee of the respondent within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006/246. 2. There was not a relevant transfer on or around 22 September 2023 within the meaning of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006/246. 3. The complaints of unfair dismissal and failing to make a redundancy payment are dismissed because the claimant was not continuously employed by the respondent for a period of not less than two years. 4. The complaint of wrongful dismissal is dismissed as the claimant was paid for the notice period to which she was entitled under statute. Case No: 3303643/2024 REASONS Key to references: [x] = page x of agreed bundle; {y} = paragraph y of the statement of the witness being referred to. INTRODUCTION 1. The claimant worked at a beauty salon (“the salon”) from 2008. The business was operated by the respondent company (“NML”), in which the claimant was a shareholder. It traded under the name Pretty Woman & Everyman, the name of the salon. On 22 September 2023 all the shares in the business were sold to a company called Your Skin Coach Limited “YSCL”, of which Miss Cara Jeffrey was (and is) the sole shareholder. The same day the claimant signed an employment contract with NML, now of course controlled by Miss Jeffrey, as a Senior Beauty Therapist. The claimant was dismissed from that role, with one week’s not...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Nikki Marks Ltd

Employer page →View all cases →

Employment Details

Industry
Other

Case Details

Case Number
3303643/2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Level
First instance
Decision Date
23/01/2025
Published
30/01/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Dick