Decision date
9 August 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge S Povey
Case Summary
The tribunal determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear most of the claimant's complaints against both respondents. All complaints except disability discrimination and unpaid wages against the First Respondent were struck out under Rule 37 as having no reasonable prospects of success, and all complaints against the Second Respondent were struck out on the same basis due to lack of jurisdiction.
Why this outcome?
Jurisdictional barThe tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to determine the majority of complaints against the First Respondent (except disability discrimination and unpaid wages) and all complaints against the Second Respondent, resulting in those claims being struck out as having no reasonable prospects of success.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •Tribunal jurisdiction over claims against First Respondent
- •Tribunal jurisdiction over claims against Second Respondent
- •Whether complaints have reasonable prospects of success
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page. Tribunal Intel does not republish the raw judgment text inline.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 3204759/2022
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 9 August 2024
- Published
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Povey
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Registered Company
- Company name
- FORD RETAIL LIMITED
- Company number
- 00191596
- Industry
- Retail & Wholesale
- Status
- active