3200013/2025Claimant won

Redspot Care Ltd

v M Asiedu

22 May 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Searley

Respondent

Redspot Care Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

22 May 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Searley

Compensation awarded

£7,618

Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.

Case Summary

The claimant presented a claim for unauthorised wage deductions. The respondent failed to submit a valid response on time. The tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure and found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages, ordering payment of £7617.78.

Why this outcome?

Default — respondent did not respond

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, allowing the tribunal to make a determination of the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages.

Key Issues

  • unauthorised deductions from wages
  • respondent's failure to present valid response on time

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Michael Asiedu Respondent: Redspot Care Limited JUDGMENT 1. The claim was presented in the London East Employment Tribunal on 8 January 2025. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. 2. The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £7617.78 gross. 3. The respondent must pay the claimant £7617.78 in total. Approved by: Employment Judge Searley 22 May 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.