Decision date
22 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Searley
Compensation awarded
£7,618
Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.
Case Summary
The claimant presented a claim for unauthorised wage deductions. The respondent failed to submit a valid response on time. The tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure and found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages, ordering payment of £7617.78.
Why this outcome?
Default — respondent did not respondThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, allowing the tribunal to make a determination of the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •unauthorised deductions from wages
- •respondent's failure to present valid response on time
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Michael Asiedu Respondent: Redspot Care Limited JUDGMENT 1. The claim was presented in the London East Employment Tribunal on 8 January 2025. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. 2. The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £7617.78 gross. 3. The respondent must pay the claimant £7617.78 in total. Approved by: Employment Judge Searley 22 May 2026
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- M Asiedu
- Case No.
- 3200013/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 22 May 2026
- Published
- 12 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Searley