North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
v O Ruzieva
Decision date
12 December 2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Batten
Case Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the claims of sex discrimination, race discrimination and religion/belief discrimination as not well-founded.
Why this outcome?
Claim not well-foundedThe tribunal found that the claims of sex discrimination, race discrimination and religion/belief discrimination had no merit on the evidence presented at the full hearing.
Key Issues
- •discrimination_sex
- •discrimination_race
- •discrimination_religion
Decision Text
Case No: 2403470/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: O Ruzieva Respondent: North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust HEARD AT: Carlisle On: 29 – 31 July 2024 5 + 6 August 2024 9, 10 + 12 December 2024 (11 December 2024 in chambers) BEFORE: Employment Judge Batten K Fulton L Hopley REPRESENTATION: For the Claimant: in person For the Respondent: A Crammond, Counsel JUDGMENT The unanimous judgment of the Tribunal is that the complaints of sex discrimination, race discrimination and religion/belief discrimination are not well-founded and are dismissed. _____________________________ Employment Judge Batten 12 December 2024 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON: 18 December 2024 ........................................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 2403470/2023 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings, and accompanying Guidance, which can …
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- O Ruzieva
- Case No.
- 2403470/2023
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 12 December 2024
- Published
- 25 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
- Industry
- Healthcare
- Representation
- Litigant in person