Decision date
30 April 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Phil Allen
Case Summary
The claimant brought a claim against Royal Mail Group Limited. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 26 January 2026 warning that the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The claimant failed to respond to this warning, and the claim was struck out.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter giving him an opportunity to explain his intention to proceed.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •Claim not actively pursued
- •Failure to respond to tribunal warning letter
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2400287/2025
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 30 April 2026
- Published
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen