2400287/2025Struck out

Royal Mail Group Ltd

30 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Phil Allen

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

30 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Phil Allen

Case Summary

The claimant brought a claim against Royal Mail Group Limited. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 26 January 2026 warning that the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The claimant failed to respond to this warning, and the claim was struck out.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter giving him an opportunity to explain his intention to proceed.

Key Issues

  • Claim not actively pursued
  • Failure to respond to tribunal warning letter

Original published judgment

The full source document is available from the official publication page.

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.