Decision date
1 June 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Tueje
Compensation awarded
£60
Extracted from judgment text — may not capture every award component precisely.
Case Summary
The claimant brought complaints of unauthorised wage deductions and indirect sex discrimination against the respondent. The tribunal found the wage deduction complaint well-founded and awarded £60 for the deducted sum plus £480 under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for breach of duty to provide written employment particulars. The indirect sex discrimination complaint was dismissed.
Why this outcome?
One claim dismissed on the meritsThe unauthorised deduction complaint was upheld because the respondent made a deduction from wages without authorisation during the specified period. The sex discrimination complaint failed because it was not well-founded. Additionally, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide written employment particulars, warranting a four weeks' gross pay award under section 38 Employment Act 2002.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •unauthorised deductions from wages
- •breach of duty to provide written statement of employment particulars
- •indirect sex discrimination
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2311750/2024
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 1 June 2026
- Published
- 26 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tueje
- Representation
- Legally represented