The Canterbury Academy

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against The Canterbury Academy was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for failure to actively pursue the claim. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 14 February 2026 giving the claimant an opportunity to respond, but the claimant did not reply.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but failed to respond.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Antoinette Mennell Respondent: The Canterbury Academy JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 14 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 2 May 2026