The Craylands School and Kent County Council

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against The Craylands School and Kent County Council was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal had warned the claimant on 3 November 2025 that it was considering striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued, but the claimant failed to respond to the warning letter.

The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning letter of 3 November 2025 giving them an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: T Hael Respondent: The Craylands School Kent County Council JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 3 November 2025 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 14 March 2026