Willesborough Infant School

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Willesborough Infant School was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for lack of active pursuit. The Tribunal gave the claimant notice on 14 February 2026 and an opportunity to respond, but the claimant failed to reply.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued by the claimant. The claimant was given notice and an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but failed to respond.

• •Whether the claim should be struck out for not being actively pursued

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Adele Coniam Respondent: Willesborough Infant School JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 14 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 2 May 2026