2308739/2020Struck out

The Abbey School Academy

v J Allen

2 May 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

The Abbey School Academy

All cases →

Decision date

2 May 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal warned the claimant on 14 February 2026 that it was considering striking out the claim due to lack of active pursuit. The claimant failed to respond to the warning letter, and the claim was accordingly struck out.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued it and failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

Key Issues

  • claim not actively pursued

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Jackie Allen Respondent: The Abbey School Academy JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 14 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Andrews Employment Judge Andrews 2 May 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 2 May 2026 Mrs J Tidy FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.