Decision date
2 May 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Andrews
Case Summary
The claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal warned the claimant on 14 February 2026 that it was considering striking out the claim due to lack of active pursuit. The claimant failed to respond to the warning letter, and the claim was accordingly struck out.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued it and failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
Key Issues
- •claim not actively pursued
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Jackie Allen Respondent: The Abbey School Academy JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 14 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Andrews Employment Judge Andrews 2 May 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 2 May 2026 Mrs J Tidy FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- J Allen
- Case No.
- 2308739/2020
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 2 May 2026
- Published
- 29 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews