2308728/2020Struck out

Brockhill Park Performing Arts College

v J Woods

2 May 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

Brockhill Park Performing Arts College

All cases →

Decision date

2 May 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's employment tribunal claim against Brockhill Park Performing Arts College was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 14 February 2026 advising the claimant that the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued and offering an opportunity to respond, but the claimant failed to reply.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to respond to a warning letter issued under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 that gave them an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

Key Issues

  • Whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Jackie Woods Respondent: Brockhill Park Performing Arts College JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 14 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 2 May 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.