2308654/2020Struck out

Brook Community Primary School

v E Hughes

28 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

Brook Community Primary School

All cases →

Decision date

28 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's employment tribunal claim against Brook Community Primary School was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal had warned the claimant on 14 February 2026 that it was considering striking out the claim because it had not been actively pursued, but the claimant failed to respond to the warning letter or request a hearing.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 14 February 2026 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

Key Issues

  • Claim not actively pursued

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Elizabeth Hughes Respondent: Brook Community Primary School JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 14 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; • 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 28 April 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.