Rowhill School

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Rowhill School was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to respond to a strike-out warning on 14 February 2026, but the claimant did not reply.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, the claimant was warned of this on 14 February 2026 and given an opportunity to explain or request a hearing, and the claimant failed to respond.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Susan Callahan Respondent: Rowhill School JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 14 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 25 April 2026