Endeavor MAT

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against Endeavor MAT was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal gave the claimant notice and opportunity to respond on 8 November 2025, but the claimant failed to reply.

The claim was struck out because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning letter of 8 November 2025 giving an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

• •whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: I Black Respondent: Endeavor MAT JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 8 November 2025 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 24 March 2026