St Saviour’s C Of E Primary School

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against St Saviour's C Of E Primary School was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal gave the claimant notice and an opportunity to respond on 12 December 2025, but the claimant did not reply, leading to the strike-out order.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, the tribunal gave the claimant notice and opportunity to respond under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, and the claimant failed to reply.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: M Vidal Respondent: St Saviour’s C Of E Primary School JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 December 2025 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 24 March 2026