Julian’s Primary School

Case Summary

The claimant's employment tribunal claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal sent a warning letter on 12 December 2026 giving the claimant an opportunity to respond, but the claimant failed to reply.

The claim was struck out because the claimant failed to actively pursue the claim and did not respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 12 December 2026 that gave them an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for non-pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: D Radvanyi Respondent: Julian’s Primary School JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 December 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 14 March 2026