St Jude’s C E Primary School

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against St Jude's C.E Primary School was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal issued a warning letter on 12 December 2025 advising that the claim had not been actively pursued, but the claimant failed to respond or request a hearing, resulting in the strike-out order.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, and the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's warning letter dated 12 December 2025 or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning.

• •Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: S Heron Respondent: St Jude’s C.e Primary School JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 December 2025 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 14 March 2026