2307968/2020Struck Out

St George’s Church of England Foundation School

v Ms H Hutchinson

24 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

St George’s Church of England Foundation School

All cases →

Decision date

24 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against St George's Church of England Foundation School was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for failure to actively pursue the claim. The Tribunal gave the claimant notice and opportunity to respond on 2 February 2026, but received no reply, resulting in the strike-out order.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal gave the claimant written notice on 2 February 2026 under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but the claimant failed to respond.

Key Issues

  • Whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms H Hutchinson Respondent: St George’s Church of England Foundation School JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 2 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 24 March 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.