Decision date
13 May 2025
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Andrews
Case Summary
The claim was struck out as the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letter regarding the Harpur Trust litigation and has not provided an alternate address.
Why this outcome?
Non-compliance with ordersThe claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's letter regarding the Harpur Trust litigation and did not provide an alternate address, demonstrating non-engagement with the proceedings.
Claim Types
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: H Plank Respondent: 1. Birchington Primary, 2. Kent County Council JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS On 26 March 2025 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant asking if, in light of the out- come of the Harpur Trust litigation, did they wish to pursue their claim or withdraw. 1. That letter was returned to the Tribunal office as the claimant is no longer at that address. 2. The claimant has not advised the Tribunal of any alternate correspondence address. 3. It appears therefore that the claimant is not actively pursuing their claim and it is struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Andrews 13 May 2025
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- H Plank
- Case No.
- 2306905/2020
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 13 May 2025
- Published
- 30 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews
- Industry
- Public Sector / Government