2305401/2020Struck out

The Victory Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust

v K Allen

11 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

The Victory Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust

All cases →

Decision date

11 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's employment tribunal claim against The Victory Academy and Thinking Schools Academy Trust was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal issued a warning letter on 11 February 2026 indicating the claim had not been actively pursued and gave the claimant an opportunity to respond, but the claimant failed to reply.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, the tribunal issued a Rule 38 warning letter giving the claimant an opportunity to explain or request a hearing, and the claimant failed to respond.

Key Issues

  • Whether claim should be struck out for failure to actively pursue

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Kathryn Allen Respondent: 1. The Victory Academy 2. Thinking Schools Academy Trust JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 11 February 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 11 April 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.