2305185/2020Struck out

The Thinking Schools Academy Trust

v J Hoare

14 April 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

The Thinking Schools Academy Trust

All cases →

Decision date

14 April 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim against The Thinking Schools Academy Trust was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 31 January 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to respond to the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to a warning letter dated 31 January 2026 that gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

Key Issues

  • whether the claim had been actively pursued

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Julia Hoare Respondent: The Thinking Schools Academy Trust JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 31 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 14 April 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.