Aletheia Anglican Academy Trust

Case Summary

The claimant's claim was struck out following a warning letter sent on 28 January 2026 in which the Tribunal indicated it was considering striking out the claim as it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the letter or request a hearing, and the Tribunal proceeded to strike out the claim.

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but the claimant did not reply.

• •Whether the claim should be struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for lack of active pursuit

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs J Petey Respondent: Aletheia Anglican Academy Trust JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 28 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 21 March 2026