Decision date
14 March 2026
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Andrews
Case Summary
The claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal sent a warning letter on 27 January 2026 giving the claimant an opportunity to respond or request a hearing, but the claimant did not reply. The claim was therefore struck out.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's warning letter dated 27 January 2026 which gave them an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
Key Issues
- •whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit
Original published judgment
The full source document is available from the official publication page. Tribunal Intel does not republish the raw judgment text inline.
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Case No.
- 2303599/2020
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision
- 14 March 2026
- Published
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews