2303448/2020Struck Out

Divergent Partnership Trust

v Mrs T Hodgson

14 March 2026·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Andrews

Respondent

Divergent Partnership Trust

All cases →

Decision date

14 March 2026

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Andrews

Case Summary

The claimant's claim was struck out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 20 January 2026 offering an opportunity to explain or request a hearing, but the claimant did not respond.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, and the claimant failed to respond to a warning letter from the Tribunal giving them an opportunity to explain or request a hearing.

Key Issues

  • Whether claim should be struck out for lack of active pursuit

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs T Hodgson Respondent: Divergent Partnership Trust JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 20 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that • the claim had not been actively pursued; 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. The claim is therefore struck out. Employment Judge Andrews 14 March 2026

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.