2213200/2024Struck out

ABM Facility Services UK Ltd

v Mr M Cisse

18 July 2024·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Brown

Respondent

ABM Facility Services UK Ltd

All cases →

Decision date

18 July 2024

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Brown

Case Summary

Claim struck out as the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order and did not make representations or request a hearing.

Why this outcome?

Non-compliance with orders

The claimant failed to comply with a tribunal order and did not make representations or request a hearing, resulting in the claim being struck out.

Claim Types

Key Issues

  • Claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 8 April 2024: By 22 April 2024 to send to the Respondent a document setting out how much compensation for lost earnings or other losses you are claiming and how the amount has been calculated; By 12 June 2024 to send to the Respondent copies of all the documents you have relevant to the claim, including documents relevant to financial losses and what the claimant has done to find another job.
  • The claim had not been actively pursued

Decision Text

Full PDF

Case No: 2213200/2024 6.8 Judgment on Withdrawal rule 52 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Cisse Respondent: ABM Facility Services UK Ltd JUDGMENT The claim is struck out REASONS 1. By a letter dated 18 June 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because: • The Claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 8 April 2024: o By 22 April 2024 to send to the Respondent a document setting out how much compensation for lost earnings or other losses you are claiming and how the amount has been calculated o By 12 June 2024 to send to the Respondent copies of all the documents you have relevant to the claim, including documents relevant to financial losses and what the claimant has done to find another job. • The claim had not been actively pursued 2. The claimant failed to make representations in writing why this should not be done, or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out . _____________________________ Employment Judge Brown 18 July 2024 _____________________________ JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 23 July 2024 ........................................................................................ ........................................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.