1801622/2023Struck out

Leeds Beckett University

v Mr C Bell

7 December 2023·Employment Tribunal·England & Wales·Employment Judge Davies

Respondent

Leeds Beckett University

All cases →

Decision date

7 December 2023

Tribunal

Employment Tribunal

Jurisdiction

England & Wales

Judge

Employment Judge Davies

Case Summary

The claim was struck out as the Claimant did not respond to a warning from the Tribunal and had previously suggested he did not object to its strikeout.

Why this outcome?

Not actively pursued

The claimant failed to respond to a tribunal warning and had previously indicated he did not object to the claim being struck out.

Claim Types

Key Issues

  • Claim not actively pursued

Decision Text

Full PDF

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C Bell Respondent: Leeds Beckett University JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the Claimant on 24 November 2023 warning him that the claim might be struck out because it has not been actively pursued. The Claimant was given the opportunity explain why the claim should not be struck out. The Claimant has not responded. His previous correspondence on 14 November 2023 suggested that he did not object to his claim being struck out. It is therefore in the interests of justice to strike out the claim. 2. The hearing fixed for 15 January 2024 to 18 January 2024 will not take place. Employment Judge Davies 7 December 2023

Something doesn't look right?

Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.